Bronze Interior Space and Exhibition Design · 2026
Landform Pulsation Research Interior
by Chiao Yi Tang and Wan Shih Yang
- A' Design Award 2026 Bronze Winner in Interior Space and Exhibition Design
- Awarded April 15, 2026
- CLIENT: Ruentex Interior Design Inc.
- Estimated Number of Design Views: 8,056
- Verification code D1C2B1C360 · Verify this award
About Landform Pulsation Research Interior
The research building integrates new and existing volumes, aiming to create a highly experimental environment. The design draws from the diverse pulsations of natural landforms, symbolizing the Earth's rhythmic breath. The design multiplies and extends spatial layers. It creates an open and infinitely extendable order. The visual narrative unfolds from the Earth's core to the galactic scale, expressed through seismic wave imagery, highlighting the coevolution and harmonious development of earthquake engineering and the land.
Chiao-Yi Tang's Landform Pulsation Research Interior exemplifies contemporary institutional spatial design strategies that prioritize transparency, material honesty, and intuitive wayfinding through chromatic differentiation and volumetric generosity, reflecting broader architectural movements toward dematerialization and visitor-centered experience design that have characterized progressive institutional architecture since the turn of the millennium. The spatial composition demonstrates sophisticated understanding of circulation design principles, employing the ascending staircase not merely as functional infrastructure but as sculptural element and organizational spine that structures visitor movement through vertical space while simultaneously serving as visual anchor drawing attention upward through the multi-level environment, a strategy recalling the prominence given to monumental staircases in museum and cultural institution design traditions extending from neoclassical precedents through modernist interpretations to contemporary spatial strategies. The material palette reveals disciplined restraint characteristic of minimalist design vocabularies, limiting chromatic intervention to strategic accents including the warm golden yellow exhibition zone establishing a beacon within the neutral field, the teal stair risers and accent walls providing wayfinding clarity, and natural wood tones introducing tactile warmth and biophilic resonance, while maintaining extensive neutral zones of concrete, white walls, and black structural systems that allow programmatic elements and visitor activity to achieve visual prominence without competing with architectural assertiveness. The decision to expose ceiling infrastructure including structural systems, mechanical ductwork, and lighting tracks reflects contemporary architectural values prioritizing material authenticity and functional legibility over decorative concealment, traditions emerging from high-tech architecture of the late twentieth century and continuing through industrial-chic aesthetics that celebrate building systems as honest expression of spatial production rather than elements requiring cosmetic masking. The transparent cable railing systems demonstrate technical sophistication in balancing code-required safety barriers with visual permeability, maintaining sightlines across levels and preserving spatial continuity that allows visitors on multiple floors to maintain awareness of activity throughout the vertical volume, fostering collective experience and institutional vitality. The lighting design employs layered strategies combining recessed directional fixtures providing dramatic highlighting of key zones, ambient illumination softening shadows and ensuring even visibility throughout circulation paths, and the chromatic beacon of the yellow exhibition wall functioning as luminous focal point organizing spatial navigation, this multi-modal approach to illumination creating hierarchy, drama, and functional clarity simultaneously. The yellow exhibition environment visible in the background middle ground appears dedicated to timeline displays and historical or project documentation, the systematic horizontal banding of informational graphics suggesting narrative progression and temporal organization, the choice of saturated warm yellow providing maximum visibility and energetic presence that communicates accessibility and invitation, potentially referencing historical associations between yellow and knowledge, enlightenment, and optimistic futurity in color symbolism across cultures. The polished concrete flooring demonstrates material refinement characteristic of high-quality contemporary construction, its subtle tonal variation and controlled reflectivity providing durable, low-maintenance surfaces appropriate for high-traffic institutional environments while maintaining aesthetic sophistication, the cool gray tonality serving as neutral ground allowing chromatic accents to achieve their full visual impact. The compositional achievement of this spatial design resides in its successful negotiation between institutional authority and welcoming accessibility, between material restraint and chromatic vibrancy, between industrial honesty and refined detailing, creating an environment that communicates professionalism and intellectual seriousness while remaining approachable and navigable for diverse visitor populations, the generous vertical volumes and abundant light contributing to atmospheric qualities of openness and possibility that invite extended engagement rather than efficient passage. How might the strategic deployment of limited chromatic accents within predominantly neutral spatial fields inform contemporary approaches to institutional wayfinding and experiential design, and what role does material honesty play in establishing trust and legibility within spaces dedicated to research, education, and public knowledge dissemination?
Press Kit
- Unique Properties
- The research complex unites new and existing structures to form an experimental architectural environment. Inspired by the pulsating dynamics of natural landforms, the design evokes the rhythmic breath of the Earth through layered spatial multiplication and extension. Visualized from the Earth's core to the galactic scale, seismic waveform imagery anchors the concept. The project ultimately expresses an approach to earthquake engineering that evolves in harmony with the land.
- Dimensions & Packaging
- The NCREE, located on the NTU campus, expanded by adding seven steel stories atop the original six-story reinforced concrete structure, forming a 13-story composite building with floor heights of 3.2-5.2 m. The addition integrates elevators, stairs, and utility shafts, and combines seismic monitoring, technology demonstration, intelligent conference systems, and flexible spaces, creating an international platform for earthquake engineering and disaster-mitigation research.
- Tags
- Geological Stratification, Landform Pulse, Seismic Design, Resilient Architecture, Research Public Interior, Earthquake Engineering, Public Interaction, Taiwan Earthquake Research
- Production Technology
- The space is crafted with a refined palette of mineral paint, eco-friendly coatings, PP film, metal, stone, glass, engineered stone, ceramic tiles, and flame-retardant carpet, creating a calm and tactile atmosphere. Acoustic softness comes from sound-absorbing cork, wool felt, and protective corner detailing. The equipment room employs the National Earthquake Center's patented Sloped Rolling-Type Isolator and a seismic-resistant ceiling system, ensuring stable operation after a quake.
- Design Challenge
- The main challenge was translating technical earthquake concepts into intuitive spatial forms while extending the layered paths. Seismic-resistant and isolation technologies were integrated to ensure structural safety without compromising research needs, conveying the connection between earthquake engineering and the land, and reflecting the idea of coexistence and harmony. This process required multi-level innovation and cross-disciplinary collaboration.
- Project Duration
- The National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering collaborated with National Taiwan University on an expansion project, integrating new and renovated buildings within the campus. Construction began in July 2019 in Taipei, with the donation inauguration held on the morning of November 9, 2020, and the entire project completed in June 2021.
- Operation Flow
- Visitors begin at the Earth's core and follow layered paths out toward the cosmos, with natural elements woven throughout to create an engaging, hands-on experience. The space includes open interactive exhibits, informal "plaza-style" meeting and social areas, focused research zones, and flexible spaces for brainstorming and developing ideas, with smooth transitions guiding users through different conceptual layers.
- Research
- This applied architectural research integrates earthquake engineering into spatial narrative. Through collaborative sessions with NCREE, the team used structural simulations and seismic prototypes. Architects and engineers worked together to create a symbolically layered, resilient space. The project improves public awareness, safety integration, and environmental storytelling in institutional design. It impacts society by promoting disaster preparedness and advancing design in earthquake-prone areas.
- Inspiration
- This design draws inspiration from geological stratification and seismic wave rhythm, transforming natural geomorphic processes, including weathering, erosion, and deposition, into the generative logic of form and space. Its narrative unfolds from the Earth's core, mantle, and surface, expanding outward to the atmosphere and into galactic scales, shaping a layered architectural environment that echoes the planet's inner forces and embodies human resilience and adaptability.
- Image Credits
- Image #1: Photographer Xiaoxiong Liangyan, Earth Rhythms, 2021.
Image #2: Photographer Xiaoxiong Liangyan, Voices of Insight, 2021.
Image #3: Photographer Xiaoxiong Liangyan, Gateway of Trust, 2021.
Image #4: Photographer Xiaoxiong Liangyan, Aurora Research Studio, 2021.
Image #5: Photographer Xiaoxiong Liangyan, Resonance Corridor, 2021.
Video Credits: RUENTEX INTERIOR DESIGN INC., 2021. - Patents
- Copyrights belong to RUENTEX INTERIOR DESIGN INC., 2021.
Colors of Landform Pulsation Research Interior
Design Interview about Landform Pulsation Research Interior
The design inspiration for this project is rooted in the core mission of Taiwan’s national earthquake research center and the site’s geographical context within the Pacific Ring of Fire, serving as a catalyst for architectural transformation. We view earthquakes not merely as natural phenomena, but as a language of energy, structure, resilience, and regeneration, which is translated into the architectural and spatial design logic.
The primary concept draws from the layered structure of the Earth — from tectonic strata to the propagation of seismic waves — transforming these geological characteristics into architectural massing, façade articulation, spatial layering, and circulation planning. Through a composition of unfolding layers and tectonic expressions, the design reflects both the power and order of geological formations while symbolizing the research center’s continuous pursuit of seismic science and disaster prevention technologies.
In addition, the project emphasizes the integration of research, education, and public engagement. Open and interactive spaces are designed to encourage academic collaboration, interdisciplinary exchange, and communication with society, allowing the building to function not only as a research facility but also as a knowledge platform connecting science, people, and the environment.
While prioritizing functionality, safety, and sustainability, the design also incorporates natural daylight, environmental integration, and resilient strategies to address future climate and disaster challenges. The project ultimately embodies the forward-thinking, stability, and international vision of a national-level research institution.
The primary concept draws from the layered structure of the Earth — from tectonic strata to the propagation of seismic waves — transforming these geological characteristics into architectural massing, façade articulation, spatial layering, and circulation planning. Through a composition of unfolding layers and tectonic expressions, the design reflects both the power and order of geological formations while symbolizing the research center’s continuous pursuit of seismic science and disaster prevention technologies.
In addition, the project emphasizes the integration of research, education, and public engagement. Open and interactive spaces are designed to encourage academic collaboration, interdisciplinary exchange, and communication with society, allowing the building to function not only as a research facility but also as a knowledge platform connecting science, people, and the environment.
While prioritizing functionality, safety, and sustainability, the design also incorporates natural daylight, environmental integration, and resilient strategies to address future climate and disaster challenges. The project ultimately embodies the forward-thinking, stability, and international vision of a national-level research institution.
The core focus of this project is to explore how architectural space can respond to the relationship between seismic research, disaster resilience, and future environmental challenges, while establishing a national-level research facility that integrates scientific functionality, public value, and sustainable thinking.
We aimed to move beyond the conventional image of research buildings as closed and isolated environments by creating an open platform that encourages academic exchange, interdisciplinary collaboration, and communication with society. Therefore, the spatial planning emphasizes the connection between research, education, and public interaction through clear and layered circulation, shared communication spaces, and flexible functional programs that enhance both interaction efficiency and overall user experience.
In terms of architectural expression, the design draws inspiration from the Earth’s layered structure and seismic wave movements, transforming the order and energy of geological formations into architectural language. The intention is to create spatial qualities that embody stability infused with movement, and rationality balanced with the forces of nature, reflecting the research center’s long-term dedication to earthquake science and disaster prevention technologies.
In addition, the project places strong emphasis on sustainability and resilience. Through strategies such as natural daylight utilization, energy-efficient systems, environmental integration, and high-performance MEP systems, the design reduces environmental impact while enhancing the building’s adaptability to future disasters and climate challenges. We envision this project not merely as a research facility, but as a landmark that represents Taiwan’s advancements in disaster prevention technology, academic innovation, and future-oriented architectural thinking.
We aimed to move beyond the conventional image of research buildings as closed and isolated environments by creating an open platform that encourages academic exchange, interdisciplinary collaboration, and communication with society. Therefore, the spatial planning emphasizes the connection between research, education, and public interaction through clear and layered circulation, shared communication spaces, and flexible functional programs that enhance both interaction efficiency and overall user experience.
In terms of architectural expression, the design draws inspiration from the Earth’s layered structure and seismic wave movements, transforming the order and energy of geological formations into architectural language. The intention is to create spatial qualities that embody stability infused with movement, and rationality balanced with the forces of nature, reflecting the research center’s long-term dedication to earthquake science and disaster prevention technologies.
In addition, the project places strong emphasis on sustainability and resilience. Through strategies such as natural daylight utilization, energy-efficient systems, environmental integration, and high-performance MEP systems, the design reduces environmental impact while enhancing the building’s adaptability to future disasters and climate challenges. We envision this project not merely as a research facility, but as a landmark that represents Taiwan’s advancements in disaster prevention technology, academic innovation, and future-oriented architectural thinking.
In the future, we hope this project will not only be realized as a functional research facility, but also serve as an important benchmark for disaster prevention technology, resilient architecture, and sustainable design in Taiwan. By integrating architectural space, research functions, and public engagement platforms, the project aims to continuously support the development of seismic research, disaster prevention education, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
From a design perspective, we also hope to extend the project’s core philosophy of “seismic resilience × sustainable environment × public connectivity” into future public buildings, educational and research institutions, and high-tech industry spaces, providing a meaningful reference for addressing climate change and future urban challenges.
In addition, this project represents Taiwan’s professional expertise in earthquake engineering, disaster prevention technology, and integrated architectural design. Through international awards and future exchanges, we hope to showcase Taiwan’s achievements in resilient architecture and sustainable development to a broader global audience, further encouraging international collaboration and knowledge sharing.
We believe architecture should not merely serve as a functional container, but also act as a medium connecting science, people, and the environment, while continuously generating educational, research, and social value for the future.
From a design perspective, we also hope to extend the project’s core philosophy of “seismic resilience × sustainable environment × public connectivity” into future public buildings, educational and research institutions, and high-tech industry spaces, providing a meaningful reference for addressing climate change and future urban challenges.
In addition, this project represents Taiwan’s professional expertise in earthquake engineering, disaster prevention technology, and integrated architectural design. Through international awards and future exchanges, we hope to showcase Taiwan’s achievements in resilient architecture and sustainable development to a broader global audience, further encouraging international collaboration and knowledge sharing.
We believe architecture should not merely serve as a functional container, but also act as a medium connecting science, people, and the environment, while continuously generating educational, research, and social value for the future.
The design concept for this project was developed over several months through extensive research, analysis, and interdisciplinary integration. The process began with studying the site conditions, the context of seismic research, and user requirements, followed by the development of architectural concepts, spatial functionality, resilience strategies, and sustainable systems through multiple rounds of discussion and design exploration.
Given the project’s highly specialized nature and its role as a national-level research institution, our focus extended beyond architectural form alone. We placed particular emphasis on integrating seismic research, disaster resilience, public engagement, and future environmental considerations into the spatial experience. As a result, the design process became a continuous journey of refinement, collaboration, and validation.
Given the project’s highly specialized nature and its role as a national-level research institution, our focus extended beyond architectural form alone. We placed particular emphasis on integrating seismic research, disaster resilience, public engagement, and future environmental considerations into the spatial experience. As a result, the design process became a continuous journey of refinement, collaboration, and validation.
This project was developed as a commissioned design proposal; however, the concept evolved not only in response to the client’s requirements, but also from our long-term interest in the themes of earthquakes, disaster prevention, and future architectural resilience.
As the client is Taiwan’s national earthquake research institution and the site is located within a seismic zone, we sought to create more than a functional research facility. Our intention was to develop an architectural response that reflects Taiwan’s unique geographical conditions and disaster prevention challenges. We believe architecture should serve as a meaningful medium between scientific research and public engagement, while embodying resilience in the face of future environmental and climate-related challenges.
The design concept therefore draws inspiration from the Earth’s layers, geological formations, and seismic wave movements, translating the energy and order found in natural science into architectural language. These ideas informed the spatial hierarchy, circulation planning, and façade articulation, allowing the building itself to become an educational, research-oriented, and symbolic spatial medium.
At the same time, the project reflects our broader commitment to sustainable architecture and public value. We envision it not merely as a research facility, but as a landmark representing Taiwan’s expertise in disaster prevention technology, academic innovation, and future-oriented resilient urban thinking.
As the client is Taiwan’s national earthquake research institution and the site is located within a seismic zone, we sought to create more than a functional research facility. Our intention was to develop an architectural response that reflects Taiwan’s unique geographical conditions and disaster prevention challenges. We believe architecture should serve as a meaningful medium between scientific research and public engagement, while embodying resilience in the face of future environmental and climate-related challenges.
The design concept therefore draws inspiration from the Earth’s layers, geological formations, and seismic wave movements, translating the energy and order found in natural science into architectural language. These ideas informed the spatial hierarchy, circulation planning, and façade articulation, allowing the building itself to become an educational, research-oriented, and symbolic spatial medium.
At the same time, the project reflects our broader commitment to sustainable architecture and public value. We envision it not merely as a research facility, but as a landmark representing Taiwan’s expertise in disaster prevention technology, academic innovation, and future-oriented resilient urban thinking.
This project is a site-specific architectural proposal developed in response to the unique requirements of a national research institution. The project is currently being planned and coordinated by the Ruentex | Ruentec Design team in collaboration with various professional consultants and partners. As a highly customized public research facility, there are currently no plans to sell or license the production rights.
However, we hope the design concepts and integrated strategies developed through this project — including disaster resilience, sustainable environments, smart building systems integration, and public-oriented research space planning — can serve as valuable references for future public architecture, research facilities, and educational environments.
Looking ahead, we also hope to collaborate with more interdisciplinary teams to further expand the research and implementation of resilient and sustainable architectural design.
However, we hope the design concepts and integrated strategies developed through this project — including disaster resilience, sustainable environments, smart building systems integration, and public-oriented research space planning — can serve as valuable references for future public architecture, research facilities, and educational environments.
Looking ahead, we also hope to collaborate with more interdisciplinary teams to further expand the research and implementation of resilient and sustainable architectural design.
We have long been interested in how architecture can respond to environmental change, public safety, and future ways of living. As a result, we are particularly drawn to projects that integrate disaster resilience, scientific research, and sustainable environments. This project is not only a research facility, but also a platform that connects earthquake science, disaster prevention education, public engagement, and future urban resilience, making it both socially meaningful and intellectually challenging for us.
As Taiwan is located within a seismic zone, earthquakes and natural disasters are an inherent part of the environment. We believe architecture should go beyond fulfilling functional requirements and serve as an important medium for strengthening social resilience and public awareness. Through this type of project, we aim to rethink the relationship between research institutions and public space, transforming architecture from a purely functional container into a platform that encourages knowledge exchange, interdisciplinary collaboration, and social interaction.
In addition, we are interested in exploring the translation between natural science and architectural space. Inspired by the Earth’s layers, geological formations, and the dynamic movement of seismic waves, we sought to transform abstract scientific concepts into architectural language with spatial perception and emotional connection. In doing so, the building becomes not only functional and rational, but also cultural, educational, and symbolic in value.
As Taiwan is located within a seismic zone, earthquakes and natural disasters are an inherent part of the environment. We believe architecture should go beyond fulfilling functional requirements and serve as an important medium for strengthening social resilience and public awareness. Through this type of project, we aim to rethink the relationship between research institutions and public space, transforming architecture from a purely functional container into a platform that encourages knowledge exchange, interdisciplinary collaboration, and social interaction.
In addition, we are interested in exploring the translation between natural science and architectural space. Inspired by the Earth’s layers, geological formations, and the dynamic movement of seismic waves, we sought to transform abstract scientific concepts into architectural language with spatial perception and emotional connection. In doing so, the building becomes not only functional and rational, but also cultural, educational, and symbolic in value.
The inspiration for this project did not come from a single architectural work or specific designer, but rather from our long-term exploration of natural science, geological formations, resilient cities, and sustainable architecture.
From an architectural perspective, we were influenced by design approaches that emphasize structural logic, environmental responsiveness, and public engagement. This includes modern architectural ideas regarding structural honesty and spatial order, as well as contemporary sustainable design strategies that integrate natural environments, energy efficiency, and human-centered experiences. Scientific phenomena such as seismic waves, geological layering, and the movement of natural energy also played an important role in shaping the project’s conceptual direction.
In addition, we studied several research-oriented and public cultural architecture precedents, particularly those capable of integrating research functionality, educational exchange, and public accessibility. These references encouraged us to rethink research institutions not as isolated professional environments, but as open platforms that foster knowledge sharing and social interaction.
As a result, this project represents a multidisciplinary integration of architecture, science, environment, and public value, rather than an extension of any singular architectural style or design language.
From an architectural perspective, we were influenced by design approaches that emphasize structural logic, environmental responsiveness, and public engagement. This includes modern architectural ideas regarding structural honesty and spatial order, as well as contemporary sustainable design strategies that integrate natural environments, energy efficiency, and human-centered experiences. Scientific phenomena such as seismic waves, geological layering, and the movement of natural energy also played an important role in shaping the project’s conceptual direction.
In addition, we studied several research-oriented and public cultural architecture precedents, particularly those capable of integrating research functionality, educational exchange, and public accessibility. These references encouraged us to rethink research institutions not as isolated professional environments, but as open platforms that foster knowledge sharing and social interaction.
As a result, this project represents a multidisciplinary integration of architecture, science, environment, and public value, rather than an extension of any singular architectural style or design language.
The primary users of this project are researchers, academic institutions, technical professionals, and disaster prevention organizations associated with the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering. At the same time, the project also addresses the needs of educational outreach and public engagement.
Therefore, the design focuses not only on creating a high-performance research and working environment, but also on encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration, knowledge sharing, and public interaction. Through open and interactive spatial planning, we aim to provide a stronger communication platform for researchers, scholars, students, and visitors, fostering greater awareness and exchange in earthquake science and disaster prevention education.
In addition, the project reflects the future direction of public research architecture by balancing professional research functionality with sustainable environments, human-centered experiences, and resilient design thinking. The goal is to create a national-level research facility that embodies professional excellence, educational value, and public significance.
Therefore, the design focuses not only on creating a high-performance research and working environment, but also on encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration, knowledge sharing, and public interaction. Through open and interactive spatial planning, we aim to provide a stronger communication platform for researchers, scholars, students, and visitors, fostering greater awareness and exchange in earthquake science and disaster prevention education.
In addition, the project reflects the future direction of public research architecture by balancing professional research functionality with sustainable environments, human-centered experiences, and resilient design thinking. The goal is to create a national-level research facility that embodies professional excellence, educational value, and public significance.
The most distinctive aspect of this project lies in its integration of seismic research, disaster resilience, sustainable environments, and public engagement into a unified architectural language, rather than simply fulfilling the functional requirements of a research facility.
Compared to conventional research buildings, which are often characterized by enclosed and purely rational spatial models, this project places greater emphasis on the interaction between architecture and the environment, as well as between science and people. Drawing inspiration from the Earth’s layers, geological formations, and seismic wave movements, the design transforms the energy and order found in natural science into architectural space, façade articulation, and circulation planning, allowing the building itself to embody the spirit of research and disaster awareness.
Therefore, the uniqueness of this project lies not only in its architectural form, but also in its holistic design approach that integrates scientific research, public value, environmental sustainability, and future resilience into one coherent vision.
Compared to conventional research buildings, which are often characterized by enclosed and purely rational spatial models, this project places greater emphasis on the interaction between architecture and the environment, as well as between science and people. Drawing inspiration from the Earth’s layers, geological formations, and seismic wave movements, the design transforms the energy and order found in natural science into architectural space, façade articulation, and circulation planning, allowing the building itself to embody the spirit of research and disaster awareness.
Therefore, the uniqueness of this project lies not only in its architectural form, but also in its holistic design approach that integrates scientific research, public value, environmental sustainability, and future resilience into one coherent vision.
Landform × Pulsation represents the fusion of geological form and dynamic energy.
“Landform” symbolizes the Earth’s layered structure, geological formations, and natural textures, while “Pulsation” reflects seismic waves, energy transmission, and the continuous rhythm of movement and transformation.
Together, the name embodies the project’s earthquake research-driven design concept, translating the balance between geological stability and seismic dynamism into architectural space, façade articulation, and circulation design. It expresses the resonance between science, nature, and architecture.
The name also symbolizes the building’s resilience, adaptability, and evolving energy in response to future environmental and disaster-related challenges.
“Landform” symbolizes the Earth’s layered structure, geological formations, and natural textures, while “Pulsation” reflects seismic waves, energy transmission, and the continuous rhythm of movement and transformation.
Together, the name embodies the project’s earthquake research-driven design concept, translating the balance between geological stability and seismic dynamism into architectural space, façade articulation, and circulation design. It expresses the resonance between science, nature, and architecture.
The name also symbolizes the building’s resilience, adaptability, and evolving energy in response to future environmental and disaster-related challenges.
The design process for this project integrated architectural design, digital simulation, and interdisciplinary coordination tools to enhance spatial quality, environmental performance, and design precision.
During the concept development and spatial planning stages, we utilized sketch studies, 3D modeling, and parametric analysis tools to explore the relationship between geological layering, seismic movement, and architectural massing, translating these ideas into spatial hierarchy and architectural language.
In the architectural design and coordination phase, BIM (Building Information Modeling) systems were used to integrate architecture, structure, and MEP engineering, improving collaboration efficiency and construction feasibility. Environmental simulation tools were also applied to evaluate daylighting, energy performance, and environmental efficiency, supporting the project’s sustainability and resilience strategies.
In addition, visualization and rendering tools were used to communicate spatial atmosphere, materiality, and environmental qualities, allowing the design concept to fully express the integration of research, technology, and nature.
During the concept development and spatial planning stages, we utilized sketch studies, 3D modeling, and parametric analysis tools to explore the relationship between geological layering, seismic movement, and architectural massing, translating these ideas into spatial hierarchy and architectural language.
In the architectural design and coordination phase, BIM (Building Information Modeling) systems were used to integrate architecture, structure, and MEP engineering, improving collaboration efficiency and construction feasibility. Environmental simulation tools were also applied to evaluate daylighting, energy performance, and environmental efficiency, supporting the project’s sustainability and resilience strategies.
In addition, visualization and rendering tools were used to communicate spatial atmosphere, materiality, and environmental qualities, allowing the design concept to fully express the integration of research, technology, and nature.
The most unique aspect of this project is its ability to transform the abstract concept of earthquake science into a perceivable architectural and spatial experience, while integrating disaster resilience, environmental sustainability, and public engagement into one cohesive design language.
Rather than using earthquakes merely as a formal inspiration, the project deeply explores the relationships between the Earth’s layers, geological formations, and seismic wave movements, translating them into architectural massing, façade articulation, spatial layering, and circulation systems. In this way, the building itself becomes an extension of scientific research and natural energy.
In addition, the project challenges the traditionally enclosed nature of research facilities by introducing open shared spaces, flexible programs, and public interaction platforms that strengthen the connection between research, education, and society. The architecture therefore becomes not only a research facility, but also a medium for knowledge exchange and disaster prevention education.
Another distinctive feature is the project’s simultaneous emphasis on resilience and sustainability as core design strategies. Through natural daylighting, high-performance building systems, environmental integration, and future adaptability planning, the design responds to seismic conditions and climate challenges while expressing a forward-looking architectural vision that is technological, human-centered, and future-oriented.
Rather than using earthquakes merely as a formal inspiration, the project deeply explores the relationships between the Earth’s layers, geological formations, and seismic wave movements, translating them into architectural massing, façade articulation, spatial layering, and circulation systems. In this way, the building itself becomes an extension of scientific research and natural energy.
In addition, the project challenges the traditionally enclosed nature of research facilities by introducing open shared spaces, flexible programs, and public interaction platforms that strengthen the connection between research, education, and society. The architecture therefore becomes not only a research facility, but also a medium for knowledge exchange and disaster prevention education.
Another distinctive feature is the project’s simultaneous emphasis on resilience and sustainability as core design strategies. Through natural daylighting, high-performance building systems, environmental integration, and future adaptability planning, the design responds to seismic conditions and climate challenges while expressing a forward-looking architectural vision that is technological, human-centered, and future-oriented.
This project was led by the Ruentex | Ruentec Design team in collaboration with the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, National Taiwan University, and various professional consultant teams. As the project involves specialized fields such as seismic research, disaster resilience, sustainable environments, and high-performance research facilities, the entire design process adopted a highly interdisciplinary collaborative approach.
The collaboration included professionals from architecture, interior design, structural engineering, MEP engineering, sustainability consulting, smart building systems, and environmental engineering. We also engaged in discussions with experts in earthquake engineering and disaster prevention research to ensure that the architectural spaces would genuinely respond to research requirements and future operational needs.
In addition, throughout the design development process, we worked closely with all professional teams through BIM integration, environmental simulations, and technical analysis. This collaborative approach allowed comprehensive coordination between architectural concepts, spatial functionality, engineering systems, and environmental performance. Such interdisciplinary cooperation strengthened both the feasibility and integrity of the project, enabling a more effective integration of scientific research, architecture, sustainability, and resilience.
The collaboration included professionals from architecture, interior design, structural engineering, MEP engineering, sustainability consulting, smart building systems, and environmental engineering. We also engaged in discussions with experts in earthquake engineering and disaster prevention research to ensure that the architectural spaces would genuinely respond to research requirements and future operational needs.
In addition, throughout the design development process, we worked closely with all professional teams through BIM integration, environmental simulations, and technical analysis. This collaborative approach allowed comprehensive coordination between architectural concepts, spatial functionality, engineering systems, and environmental performance. Such interdisciplinary cooperation strengthened both the feasibility and integrity of the project, enabling a more effective integration of scientific research, architecture, sustainability, and resilience.
Technology in this project is not merely a supporting tool, but a key element that connects research functionality, building performance, and future resilience. As a national-level earthquake research facility, the integration of technology is intended not only to improve operational efficiency, but also to support environmental monitoring, disaster prevention safety, smart management, and sustainable operations.
The preliminary research included site environmental analysis, seismic zone characteristics, climate conditions, daylight orientation, circulation patterns, and user behavior data, all of which served as important foundations for the building layout and spatial planning. At the same time, we studied scientific concepts such as the Earth’s layered structure, geological formations, and seismic wave propagation, translating them into the design logic for architectural massing, façade articulation, and spatial language.
In terms of sustainability and resilience, we further conducted environmental simulations and performance analyses to evaluate strategies related to natural daylighting, energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, and the integration of high-performance MEP systems. These studies helped enhance the building’s energy performance and future adaptability.
In terms of sustainability and resilience, we further conducted environmental simulations and performance analyses to evaluate strategies related to natural daylighting, energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, and the integration of high-performance MEP systems. These studies helped enhance the building’s energy performance and future adaptability.
One of the greatest challenges of this project was finding a balance between highly specialized research requirements, architectural spatial quality, public accessibility, and future resilience. As a national-level earthquake research facility, the building needed not only to support the efficient demands of research, office operations, and technical equipment, but also to address disaster prevention, sustainability performance, and public engagement.
Another major challenge was translating the abstract and highly technical nature of earthquake science into a perceivable architectural language. Rather than remaining at the level of formal symbolism, we sought to deeply explore the Earth’s layered structure, geological formations, and seismic wave movements, integrating these concepts into the building massing, spatial hierarchy, circulation, and façade expression so that concept and functionality could be cohesively aligned.
Ultimately, these challenges became an important driving force in refining the design, allowing the project to evolve beyond a research facility into a holistic architectural expression that integrates science, environmental responsibility, and human-centered values.
Another major challenge was translating the abstract and highly technical nature of earthquake science into a perceivable architectural language. Rather than remaining at the level of formal symbolism, we sought to deeply explore the Earth’s layered structure, geological formations, and seismic wave movements, integrating these concepts into the building massing, spatial hierarchy, circulation, and façade expression so that concept and functionality could be cohesively aligned.
Ultimately, these challenges became an important driving force in refining the design, allowing the project to evolve beyond a research facility into a holistic architectural expression that integrates science, environmental responsibility, and human-centered values.
We decided to submit this project to an international design competition because it represents more than an architectural proposal — it embodies Taiwan’s integrated thinking and practical achievements in earthquake engineering, disaster prevention technology, resilient architecture, and sustainable design.
Through the platform of an international competition, we hope to showcase how Taiwan responds to seismic environments and future urban challenges through architecture, addressing public safety, scientific research, and environmental sustainability.
For us, participation is not only about seeking recognition, but also about sharing design ideas, encouraging knowledge exchange, and expanding international perspectives.
Through the platform of an international competition, we hope to showcase how Taiwan responds to seismic environments and future urban challenges through architecture, addressing public safety, scientific research, and environmental sustainability.
For us, participation is not only about seeking recognition, but also about sharing design ideas, encouraging knowledge exchange, and expanding international perspectives.
One of the greatest lessons we gained during the design process was a deeper understanding of how architecture can serve as a bridge between scientific research, public value, and environmental resilience. This project was not merely the planning of a research facility, but a design practice that required the integration of multiple disciplines while responding to future challenges.
Through collaboration with professional teams in earthquake engineering, disaster prevention, structural systems, MEP engineering, and sustainability, we strengthened our interdisciplinary integration capabilities and gained a deeper understanding of how to translate highly technical research requirements into an architectural experience with human-centered scale and spatial perception.
Overall, this project reinforced our belief that the value of architecture lies not only in formal expression, but also in its ability to respond to societal needs, integrate professional expertise, and create a positive impact for the future.
Through collaboration with professional teams in earthquake engineering, disaster prevention, structural systems, MEP engineering, and sustainability, we strengthened our interdisciplinary integration capabilities and gained a deeper understanding of how to translate highly technical research requirements into an architectural experience with human-centered scale and spatial perception.
Overall, this project reinforced our belief that the value of architecture lies not only in formal expression, but also in its ability to respond to societal needs, integrate professional expertise, and create a positive impact for the future.
Beyond architectural form and research functionality, another important focus of this project is how space can establish a meaningful connection between science and society. We believe that a national-level research facility should not function solely as a professional research environment, but also as a platform for knowledge exchange, public education, and social engagement.
For us, architectural space is not only about solving problems, but also about responding to the environment, carrying knowledge, and creating possibilities for the future.
For us, architectural space is not only about solving problems, but also about responding to the environment, carrying knowledge, and creating possibilities for the future.
Grand Interview about Landform Pulsation Research Interior
The turning point was realizing that geological forces are not just physical events but patterns of rhythm, energy, and transformation. Instead of replicating landforms, we translated the Earth's stratification and seismic pulsations into spatial layers, circulation, and sensory experiences, allowing the Earth's hidden dynamics to become the driving force behind both form-making and human experience.
We intentionally designed the visitor journey as an exploration that begins at the Earth's core and gradually unfolds outward. Visitors are guided through the origins of earthquakes, geological evolution, and tectonic movements, ultimately understanding how humanity coexists with these natural forces. We believe the relationship between people and the land is inseparable, much like the bond between lips and teeth. Therefore, the narrative focuses not on disaster itself, but on the resilience, wisdom, and adaptation that emerge from living with the Earth. Through layered exhibitions, flowing circulation, and immersive spatial experiences, visitors move from understanding to empathy, recognizing how seismic activity has shaped landscapes, civilizations, and human resilience. *Landform Pulsation Research Interior* seeks to transform earthquakes from a source of fear into a story of coexistence between people and the Earth.
We believe the most effective seismic design is not hidden behind walls but integrated into the visitor experience. In Landform Pulsation Research Interior, the patented rolling seismic isolation system and seismic-resistant ceiling were treated as more than technical solutions; they became part of the project's spatial narrative.Working closely with structural and engineering teams, we translated the principles behind these systems—resilience, flexibility, and energy dissipation—into the design language, circulation, and exhibition experience. Rather than concealing the technologies, we used them to illustrate how humans understand, respond to, and coexist with the Earth's dynamic forces.By making these protective systems visible and meaningful, the project transforms engineering infrastructure into an educational and symbolic element, expressing not only safety and performance, but also human ingenuity, resilience, and our ongoing dialogue with nature.
We believe research institutions should be more than places for scientific work; they should serve as platforms that connect science, society, and the public. In Landform Pulsation Research Interior, geological strata and seismic rhythms were translated into spatial experiences, transforming complex scientific concepts into something tangible and accessible.Material selections were inspired by geological textures and stratification, reinforcing the connection between space and research. Culturally, the project responds to Taiwan's seismic context within the Pacific Ring of Fire, highlighting the relationship between people and the land. Technologically, seismic protection systems, exhibition elements, and interactive features were integrated to make scientific knowledge more engaging and understandable.The project advocates a broader vision for research environments—one that supports researchers while also fostering public education, knowledge sharing, and meaningful engagement between science and society.
Due to adjustments to the elevator core, the original six-story reinforced concrete structure required seismic strengthening, while reserved connection rebars were utilized to support the addition of a seventh-story steel structure. This challenge became an opportunity to integrate structural upgrades with the project's spatial narrative.Architects, interior designers, structural engineers, and MEP consultants collaborated from the earliest stages to align seismic performance, functionality, and user experience. The spatial layout was reconfigured to accommodate the new structural conditions while maintaining design continuity.Rather than treating the addition as a separate intervention, we integrated it into the overall concept. Through consistent materials, circulation, and spatial sequencing, the existing and new volumes were seamlessly connected, reinforcing the themes of geological stratification, continuity, and resilience that define Landform Pulsation Research Interior.
In Landform Pulsation Research Interior, material selection was guided by the principles of the five senses and six perceptual dimensions. Materials such as mineral coatings, acoustic cork, wool felt, engineered stone, and ceramic tiles were chosen for their texture and tactile qualities, translating geological stratification and seismic energy into tangible spatial experiences.Sustainability and well-being were also key considerations. Low-carbon, healthy, and environmentally responsible materials were prioritized to support both environmental performance and occupant comfort. Acoustically, sound-absorbing materials were carefully integrated to create an appropriate auditory environment and enhance spatial perception.Through touch, sound, and movement, visitors can physically engage with the layered textures and rhythms of the space, strengthening the narrative of geological formation, energy flow, and the dynamic relationship between humans and the Earth.
In Landform Pulsation Research Interior, space was conceived as a journey extending from the Earth's core to the scale of the galaxy. Rather than relying on text, transitions are communicated through spatial form, scale, materiality, lighting, and circulation.Research areas employ enclosed and grounded spatial qualities to evoke the Earth's core and mantle. Interactive exhibition zones become more fluid and visually connected, representing tectonic movement and energy transmission. Social and gathering spaces gradually open up with greater light and spatial freedom, symbolizing the atmosphere and the vastness of the cosmos.Through a sequence that moves from enclosed to open, dense to expansive, and intimate to infinite, visitors intuitively experience an expanding awareness from the Earth beneath their feet to the universe beyond.
With nearly 30 years of interior design experience and expertise in healthy buildings and well-being, I have always viewed design as fundamentally human-centered. Landform Pulsation Research Interior further deepened this perspective by demonstrating that research institutions are not only spaces for knowledge production, but also platforms that connect science, people, and society.The project integrated scientific research, environmental storytelling, and well-being into a unified framework. Beyond functionality and seismic safety, it emphasized sensory experience, healthy materials, acoustic and lighting quality, and spatial settings that support comfort and interaction—aligning with WELL principles.This project reinforced my belief that design should move beyond form and function to create environments that promote health, resilience, learning, and meaningful connections between people and the built environment.
In Landform Pulsation Research Interior, the most influential methods shaping its visual and spatial language were structural behavior simulation and seismic waveform data translation. In collaboration with the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, experimental data, vibration modes, and structural responses were visualized and transformed into spatial logic defined by rhythm, direction, and intensity.Seismic prototype studies further translated variations in wave frequency and energy transmission into spatial hierarchies, circulation flows, and surface conditions, turning architecture into a dynamic system responsive to Earth's movements.Additionally, a multi-scale data integration approach—from micro material vibration to macro structural deformation—established a design logic where form is generated from data, ultimately defining a spatial language driven by seismic waves, geological layers, and energy flow.
A key principle from Landform Pulsation Research Interior is making structural resilience visible and integral to spatial storytelling, rather than hiding it as technical infrastructure. In seismic regions, safety systems can actively express how architecture responds to earthquake forces.Another lesson is translating seismic data into spatial logic, where wave behavior, energy dissipation, and structural responses shape form, circulation, and atmosphere, enabling experiential understanding.Equally important is early interdisciplinary collaboration between architects, engineers, and researchers, aligning performance and narrative as a unified system.Ultimately, environmental storytelling in institutional design shifts from isolated disaster events to continuous resilience, allowing users to intuitively experience adaptation, risk, and coexistence through space, materiality, and movement.