Ontwerper van de Dag Interview
18 vragen
I have been involved in the design field for more than 15 years, continuously exploring the relationship between creativity, functionality, and human experience.
Could you please tell us about your experience as a designer, artist, architect or creator?
I have been involved in the design field for more than 15 years, continuously exploring the relationship between creativity, functionality, and human experience. Throughout my journey, I have worked on projects across different disciplines, collaborating with clients, creatives, and organizations from diverse industries. These experiences have helped me develop a design approach that balances aesthetics with purpose and usability.
My background combines both practical experience and continuous self-development through research, experimentation, and observation. Over the years, I have had the opportunity to contribute to projects for emerging brands, creative studios, and innovation-driven companies, which strengthened my understanding of design as both a creative and strategic process.
As a designer, I am particularly interested in creating meaningful experiences that connect emotionally with people while remaining functional and timeless. Every project has contributed to my growth and helped shape my perspective on design, collaboration, and problem-solving.
How did you become a designer?
I became a designer through a combination of curiosity, creativity, and a strong interest in how people experience the world around them. From an early age, I was fascinated by art, objects, spaces, and visual communication. I was always observing details — how something was built, why certain designs felt intuitive, and how aesthetics could influence emotions and behavior. Over time, this natural curiosity developed into a deeper passion for design.
What attracted me most to design was the ability to combine creativity with problem-solving. I realized that design is not only about making things visually appealing, but also about improving experiences and creating meaningful connections between people and their environment. That understanding motivated me to pursue design more seriously.
My journey began through continuous learning, experimentation, and practical experience. I spent time studying visual culture, architecture, art, and design principles while developing technical and conceptual skills through projects and collaborations. Each experience helped me better understand the balance between function, emotion, and aesthetics.
More than any single influence, it was an internal drive to create thoughtful and meaningful work that pushed me toward becoming a designer. However, I have also been inspired by designers, artists, architects, and creative thinkers whose work demonstrated how design can shape culture and everyday life in powerful ways. Their ability to transform simple ideas into lasting experiences encouraged me to continue exploring my own creative path.
What continues to motivate me today is the belief that good design can positively impact people’s lives — sometimes in subtle ways, but often in very meaningful ones.
What are your priorities, technique and style when designing?
When approaching a new project, my priorities are always centered around purpose, human experience, and clarity. I believe successful design should not only be visually appealing, but also meaningful, functional, and emotionally engaging. The three aspects I focus on most during the design process are usability, emotional connection, and attention to detail.
First, I prioritize understanding the people who will interact with the design. Whether it is a product, space, visual identity, or experience, I believe design should feel intuitive and natural to the user. Second, I focus on creating an emotional connection through proportion, materials, atmosphere, and storytelling. A design becomes memorable when it communicates something beyond functionality. Third, I pay close attention to refinement and simplicity. Every detail should have a reason and contribute to the overall harmony of the project.
A central theme throughout my work is the balance between simplicity and meaning. I am drawn to clean, thoughtful solutions that feel timeless rather than trend-driven. I try to create designs that are honest, human-centered, and lasting.
In terms of technique, I combine both traditional and digital approaches. I still value sketching by hand because it allows ideas to develop freely and intuitively during the early stages of a project. At the same time, I rely on digital tools and modern technologies for visualization, prototyping, refinement, and communication. Depending on the project, I may create mock-ups, physical models, or material studies to better understand form, scale, and interaction before final production.
My process usually begins with research, observation, and defining the core problem or objective. From there, I move into exploration and experimentation, generating multiple concepts and testing different directions. Once a strong concept emerges, I refine the design through iteration, collaboration, and careful attention to details until the final solution feels clear, balanced, and meaningful.
Which emotions do you feel when designing?
Designing brings a mixture of excitement, curiosity, focus, and fulfillment. For me, the creative process is deeply emotional because every project begins as an idea and gradually evolves into something meaningful and tangible. There is a unique satisfaction in transforming abstract thoughts into experiences, objects, or visual forms that people can connect with and use in their everyday lives.
The most exciting phase is often the early stage of exploration, when ideas are still open and full of possibilities. I enjoy the process of research, experimentation, sketching, and discovering unexpected directions. At the same time, I also find great satisfaction in the refinement stage, where details begin to come together and the identity of the project becomes clearer. Seeing a project fully realized after a long creative journey brings a strong sense of accomplishment and gratitude.
What I enjoy most about designing is the balance between creativity and problem-solving. Design constantly challenges me to think critically while remaining imaginative. I appreciate the process of finding simple and thoughtful solutions to complex problems and creating work that communicates naturally and emotionally.
Designing gives me a sense of purpose because it allows me to contribute something meaningful. Even small details can improve how people experience the world around them, and that possibility is incredibly motivating. The pleasure I derive from design comes not only from creating something aesthetically pleasing, but from knowing that the work can inspire, help, or emotionally connect with others in a lasting way.
What particular aspects of your background shaped you as a designer?
Several aspects of my background have shaped the way I approach design today. Beyond technical skills and creative training, I believe that observation, communication, adaptability, and curiosity have been some of the most valuable qualities in my development as a designer. Design is not only about creating visuals or objects — it is also about understanding people, solving problems, and communicating ideas clearly.
One of the most important non-design skills has been the ability to observe human behavior and everyday experiences closely. Paying attention to how people interact with spaces, products, and environments has helped me create more thoughtful and user-centered solutions. Communication has also played a major role in my growth. Being able to listen, collaborate, and explain ideas effectively is essential when working with clients, teams, and different disciplines.
Another important influence has been adaptability and continuous learning. The creative field constantly evolves, so staying curious and open to new technologies, materials, cultures, and perspectives has helped me grow both creatively and professionally. I also believe patience and critical thinking are important qualities because strong design often requires research, experimentation, refinement, and careful decision-making.
Many things have influenced my design work over time, including architecture, art, nature, photography, cultural experiences, and everyday life. I am especially inspired by work that balances simplicity with emotional depth and functionality. The ability of great designers and artists to create timeless experiences has always motivated me to develop my own perspective and creative voice.
My design journey has been a continuous process of exploration and learning. Each project, collaboration, and challenge has contributed to shaping my understanding of design as both a creative and human-centered discipline. Over time, I have become more focused on creating work that is not only visually refined, but also meaningful, functional, and emotionally engaging.
What is your growth path? What are your future plans? What is your dream design project?
My growth path has always been driven by curiosity, continuous learning, and the desire to create meaningful work. Over time, I have evolved from focusing mainly on aesthetics to understanding design as a broader process that connects people, emotions, functionality, and culture. Each project, collaboration, and challenge has helped me refine my perspective and strengthen my creative voice.
In the future, I want to continue growing through interdisciplinary work that combines design, technology, sustainability, and human-centered experiences. I am especially interested in projects that create long-term value and meaningful interaction rather than temporary trends. I hope to be remembered as a designer who created thoughtful, timeless, and emotionally engaging work while contributing positively to people’s lives.
One of my dream projects would be to design an immersive experience or large-scale project that brings together architecture, art, digital interaction, and storytelling in a seamless way. I am also interested in exploring more experimental concepts that I may not yet have had the time, resources, or opportunity to fully develop. For me, the future of design is about creating experiences that feel both innovative and deeply human.
What are your advices to designers who are at the beginning of their career?
My advice to young designers is to stay curious, patient, and open to learning. Early in a career, it is easy to focus too much on trends, recognition, or perfection, but real growth comes from developing strong fundamentals and understanding people deeply. Learn how to observe, communicate, and think critically — these skills are just as important as technical ability.
I would also encourage young designers not to fear mistakes or failure. Many of the most valuable lessons come from difficult projects, rejected ideas, or unexpected challenges. Persistence and consistency are often more important than quick success. Another important lesson is to avoid comparing your creative journey too closely with others. Every designer develops at a different pace.
One of the best pieces of advice I have received is to focus on creating meaningful work rather than trying to impress people. Good design comes from honesty, curiosity, and empathy. To continue growing, I regularly explore books, art, architecture, technology, conversations, and everyday experiences because inspiration and knowledge can come from anywhere.
You are truly successful as a designer, what do you suggest to fellow designers, artists and architects?
I believe one of the most important principles for designers is to remain curious and adaptable throughout their careers. The creative field changes constantly, and successful designers are those who continue learning while staying connected to human needs and experiences. Technical skills are important, but empathy, observation, and communication are equally essential.
Another important principle is to focus on clarity and purpose rather than unnecessary complexity. Every design decision should contribute meaningfully to the overall experience. Simplicity is often more difficult — and more valuable — than decoration.
I would also encourage designers to avoid becoming overly dependent on trends. Trends can be inspiring, but lasting work usually comes from authenticity and strong conceptual thinking. It is important to develop a personal perspective while remaining open to collaboration and experimentation.
Finally, I think designers should remember that creativity grows through discipline and consistency. Inspiration is important, but strong work often comes from patience, refinement, and attention to detail over time.
What is your day to day look like?
My daily routine usually begins with reviewing ongoing projects, organizing priorities, and setting clear goals for the day. I often spend the morning focusing on research, concept development, sketching, or refining design details while my concentration is strongest. Depending on the project, the day may also include meetings, collaboration, presentations, material exploration, or digital development.
I like to stay informed about design, architecture, art, and technology, so I often spend time reading articles, observing visual references, or exploring new creative ideas. Even small moments of observation during the day can become sources of inspiration.
What I enjoy most during an ordinary workday are the quiet moments when an idea suddenly becomes clearer or a project begins to feel balanced and complete. Small discoveries, productive conversations, and seeing gradual progress are often the most rewarding parts of the process.
How do you keep up with latest design trends? To what extent do design trends matter?
I follow design trends mainly as a way to understand how culture, technology, and society are evolving, rather than as strict directions to follow. Trends can be valuable because they reflect changing behaviors, materials, and visual languages, but I do not believe design should depend entirely on what is temporarily popular.
I prefer creating work that feels timeless, meaningful, and connected to the identity of the project itself. While trends can inspire experimentation and fresh perspectives, I think the strongest designs are those that maintain authenticity and long-term value.
To stay informed, I regularly explore architecture, contemporary art, photography, technology, exhibitions, books, films, and design publications. I also find inspiration in everyday life, travel, nature, and observing how people interact with their environments. For me, inspiration is broader than trends — it comes from continuously paying attention to the world and remaining curious about new ideas and experiences.
How do you know if a product or project is well designed? How do you define good design?
Good design, to me, is when something becomes invisible in use but memorable in experience.
The strongest signal of good design is frictionlessness: a user doesn’t need to interpret the system—it already speaks their language. But that alone isn’t enough. Good design also has intention. It makes a clear trade-off between what it includes and what it removes.
When I evaluate a product or project, I look at three layers:
First is clarity—does the design communicate its purpose instantly without explanation?
Second is effortlessness—does it reduce cognitive load, not just physical steps?
Third is emotional correctness—does it feel appropriate for its context? A banking app should feel stable and calm; a creative tool should feel open and flexible.
That “aha” moment usually happens when I notice I’m no longer thinking about the interface or structure—I’m thinking only about the task I want to accomplish. The design disappears, but the outcome becomes easier.
Common mistakes that break good design are over-complication, decorative choices that fight function, inconsistent logic across systems, and designing for edge cases before solving the main path.
How do you decide if your design is ready?
A design is never mathematically “finished,” but it can become decision-complete.
I consider a design ready when three things are true:
The core problem is solved without workaround behavior
Every remaining improvement is marginal, not structural
New iterations no longer change understanding—only polish it
At that point, continuing to refine often produces diminishing returns. You risk optimizing taste instead of solving need.
There is always room for improvement in theory, but in practice, a design must ship when it becomes more valuable in the world than in your head.
Success, for me, is when users stop asking “how does this work?” and start assuming “this is how it should work.”
What is your biggest design work?
The “biggest” design work is usually not the most visually impressive—it’s the one that changed how you think.
A meaningful project typically starts with uncertainty: a vague problem, unclear constraints, and no obvious reference. The design process becomes a way of discovering the problem itself, not just solving it.
What makes such a project special is not only the final output but the evolution of thinking during it. You begin with assumptions, and end with a system that contradicts them in useful ways.
The most satisfying work tends to include:
constraints that forced invention
repeated simplification cycles
and moments where complexity collapsed into clarity
If there is an ongoing project I’d be most excited about, it’s usually the one where the core idea still feels slightly unfinished in language—but complete in behavior. That tension is where the best design lives.
Who is your favourite designer?
Rather than a single “favorite,” I tend to admire designers who build systems rather than objects.
People like Dieter Rams are important because they established restraint as a design principle. Jony Ive showed how emotional subtlety can exist in mass-produced objects. Paula Scher demonstrates that typography can behave like architecture in public space. And Buckminster Fuller represents the idea that design can be systemic and planetary, not just visual.
If I could speak to one historical figure, it would likely be someone like Rams, because his principles are less about style and more about discipline—something every generation of designers has to relearn.
The most impactful designers are often not the most expressive, but the most consistent in their logic.
Would you tell us a bit about your lifestyle and culture?
Design thinking tends to spill into daily life whether you want it to or not.
Environments become systems to optimize: light, sound, rhythm, even how you move through space. Cities that inspire design thinking are usually those with visible layering—places where old and new coexist rather than replace each other.
Music often plays a quiet role in creative processes because it structures attention without demanding visual focus. It becomes a way to control tempo in thinking.
Culture inevitably shapes design decisions. What feels “simple” in one culture may feel “empty” in another. What feels “rich” may feel “cluttered” elsewhere.
Small design-driven changes in life often include removing unnecessary steps from routines, reducing visual noise in personal tools, and prioritizing consistency over variety in everyday systems.
Good design, at a personal level, becomes a way of reducing decision fatigue so attention can go to more meaningful problems.
Would you tell us more about your work culture and business philosophy?
A strong design culture is built on trust, not hierarchy of taste.
Working well with others depends less on agreement and more on shared principles: clarity, honesty about constraints, and willingness to discard work that is “almost good.”
The best collaborators are those who can separate ego from iteration. If everything is personal, nothing improves.
In teams, I value three traits most:
curiosity about the problem, not just the solution
tolerance for revision
and the ability to articulate reasoning, not just preference
A designer’s responsibility is not just to make things look better, but to make systems behave more predictably and humanely.
The hardest part of the profession is accepting that most decisions are trade-offs, not optimizations.
What are your philanthropic contributions to society as a designer, artist and architect?
Design gives back most effectively when it improves access—access to information, services, or dignity in interaction.
Pro bono or socially oriented design work is meaningful because it removes commercial pressure and focuses attention on impact. But even outside formal projects, designers contribute by improving everyday systems that people depend on but rarely notice.
Participation in design communities and mentorship spaces is one of the most sustainable forms of contribution. It compounds over time by improving how the next generation thinks, not just what they produce.
Good design, at its best, is already a form of public service.
What positive experiences you had when you attend the A' Design Award?
Design awards and competitions matter less for the trophy and more for the forcing function they create.
They provide three main benefits:
First, external perspective—your work is evaluated outside your internal bias loop.
Second, discipline of articulation—you must explain not just what you made, but why it matters.
Third, exposure to comparison—you see where your thinking sits within a broader field.
Competitions accelerate growth because they compress reflection cycles. You design, evaluate, and reposition your work more quickly than in normal production environments.
Being recognized (for example, as Designer of the Day) is less important than what it forces internally: it creates a checkpoint where you reassess whether your design principles are still coherent, or just habitual.